arguments_for_ai_risk:is_ai_an_existential_threat_to_humanity:interviews_on_the_strength_of_the_evidence_for_ai_risk_claims

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
arguments_for_ai_risk:is_ai_an_existential_threat_to_humanity:interviews_on_the_strength_of_the_evidence_for_ai_risk_claims [2023/10/12 09:18]
rosehadshar
arguments_for_ai_risk:is_ai_an_existential_threat_to_humanity:interviews_on_the_strength_of_the_evidence_for_ai_risk_claims [2023/10/13 07:55]
rosehadshar
Line 9: Line 9:
 * We contacted AI researchers we knew (or knew of) at some prominent labs and AI safety organizations and in academia * We contacted AI researchers we knew (or knew of) at some prominent labs and AI safety organizations and in academia
     * This was not a systematic process, and we expect there to be some substantive bias introduced both by who we reached out to and who agreed to be interviewed     * This was not a systematic process, and we expect there to be some substantive bias introduced both by who we reached out to and who agreed to be interviewed
-* All but one of the people we interviewed are concerned about AI risk and spend some or all of their work time working to reduce it+* All of the people we interviewed are concerned about AI risk and spend some or all of their work time working to reduce it
     * On the one hand, this means that they are expert in the topic we’re interested in (the evidence for AI risk claims)     * On the one hand, this means that they are expert in the topic we’re interested in (the evidence for AI risk claims)
     * On the other hand, it also means that they have an incentive to interpret the evidence as stronger rather than weaker     * On the other hand, it also means that they have an incentive to interpret the evidence as stronger rather than weaker
-    * **The information we’ve gathered from the interview series should therefore be taken as evidence _for _AI risk claims, rather than an unbiased review of the evidence on AI risk claims _overall_**+    * **The information we’ve gathered from the interview series should therefore be taken as evidence _for_ AI risk claims, rather than an unbiased review of the evidence on AI risk claims _overall_**
  
  
arguments_for_ai_risk/is_ai_an_existential_threat_to_humanity/interviews_on_the_strength_of_the_evidence_for_ai_risk_claims.txt · Last modified: 2023/10/13 07:55 by rosehadshar