AI Impacts Wiki

This page is read only. You can view the source, but not change it. Ask your administrator if you think this is wrong.
====== Human-Level AI ======

// Published 23 January, 2014; last updated 07 August, 2022 //



<HTML>
<p>‘<em>Human-level AI’</em> refers to AI which can reproduce everything a human can do, approximately. Several variants of this concept are worth distinguishing.</p>
</HTML>



===== Details =====


==== Variations in the meaning of ‘human-level AI’ ====


<HTML>
<p>Considerations in specifying ‘human-level AI’ more precisely:</p>
</HTML>


<HTML>
<ul>
<li><div class="li"><strong>Do we mean to imply anything about running costs?</strong> Is an AI that reproduces human behavior for ten billion dollars per year ‘human-level’, or does it need to be human-priced? See <em>‘human-level at any cost vs. human-level at human cost’</em> below for more details.</div></li>
<li><div class="li"><b>What characteristics of a human need to be reproduced?</b> Usually we do not mean that the AI should be indistinguishable from a human. For instance, we usually do not care whether it looks like a human. A common requirement is that the AI have the economically valuable skills of a human. We sometimes also talk about AI being ‘human-level’ in a narrower set of relevant characteristics, such as in its ability to do further AI research.</div></li>
<li><div class="li"><b>What does it mean to reproduce human behavior?</b> If AI replaces all hairdressers in society, but uniformly produces a slightly worse haircut in some dimensions (but so cheaply!), does that count as ‘human-level’? If not, then all humans may be replaced even though AI is not ‘human-level’. On the other hand, if this does count, then where is the line? Can an AI ‘reproduce human behavior’ by merely producing anything a buyer would prefer to have than what a human produces? Many machines already do this, and this is not what we mean.</div></li>
<li><div class="li"><b>How much of human behavior needs to be reproduced?</b> If AI cannot entirely compete with humans for the job of waiter, merely because some small population prefers human waiters, this will not make a large difference to anything, so a requirement that human-level AI replace humans in all economically useful skills is too high a bar for what we are intuitively interested in. There is a further question of what metric one might use when specifying the bar.</div></li>
<li><div class="li"><b>What conditions is the AI available under?</b> Does it matter if it has actually been built? Need it be available in some particular marketplace, or quantity, or price range?</div></li>
</ul>
</HTML>


==== Related definitions ====


=== High Level Machine Intelligence (HLMI) ===


<HTML>
<p>The 2016 and 2022 Expert Surveys on Progress in AI use the following definition:</p>
</HTML>


<HTML>
<blockquote>
<p>Say we have ‘high-level machine intelligence’ when unaided machines can accomplish every task better and more cheaply than human workers. Ignore aspects of tasks for which being a human is intrinsically advantageous, e.g. being accepted as a jury member. Think feasibility, not adoption.</p>
</blockquote>
</HTML>


=== Superhuman AI ===


<HTML>
<p>A ‘superhuman’ system is meaningfully more capable than a human-level system. In practice the first human-level system <a href="/doku.php?id=clarifying_concepts:human-level_ai#Human-level_is_superhuman">is likely</a> to be superhuman.</p>
</HTML>


==== Key issues ====


=== Human-level at any cost vs. human-level at human cost ===


<HTML>
<p>In common usage, ‘human-level’ AI can mean either AI which can reproduce a human at any cost and speed, or AI which can replace a human (i.e. is as cheap as a human, and can be used in the same situations). Both are relevant for different issues. For instance, the ‘at any cost’ meaning is important when considering how people will respond to human-level artificial intelligence, or whether a human-level artificial intelligence will use illicit means to acquire resources and cause destruction. Human-level at human cost is the relevant concept when thinking about AI replacing humans in the labor market, the economy growing very fast, or legitimate AI development ramping up into an intelligence explosion.</p>
</HTML>


<HTML>
<p>Today few applications are more than an order of magnitude more expensive to run than a human, suggesting a short time before an AI project came down in price to the cost of a human. However some applications are more expensive, and even if an early AI project were only a few orders of magnitude more expensive than a human per time, it may be much slower. Thus it is hard to make useful inferences about the potential time delay between an arbitrarily expensive human-level AI and an AI which might replace a human, even if we assume hardware continues to fall in price regularly.</p>
</HTML>


=== ‘Human-level’ is superhuman ===


<HTML>
<p>As explained at the <a href="http://lesswrong.com/lw/ku6/superintelligence_reading_group_section_1_past/">Superintelligence Reading Group</a>:</p>
</HTML>


<HTML>
<blockquote>
<p>Another thing to be aware of is the diversity of mental skills. If by ‘human-level’ we mean a machine that is at least as good as a human at each of these skills, then in practice the first ‘human-level’ machine will be much better than a human on many of those skills. It may not seem ‘human-level’ so much as ‘very super-human’.</p>
<p>We could instead think of human-level as closer to ‘competitive with a human’ – where the machine has some super-human talents and lacks some skills humans have. This is not usually used, I think because it is hard to define in a meaningful way. There are already machines for which a company is willing to pay more than a human: in this sense a microscope might be ‘super-human’. There is no reason for a machine which is equal in value to a human to have the traits we are interested in talking about here, such as agency, superior cognitive abilities or the tendency to drive humans out of work and shape the future. Thus we talk about AI which is at least as good as a human, but you should beware that the predictions made about such an entity may apply before the entity is technically ‘human-level’.</p>
<figure aria-describedby="caption-attachment-297" class="wp-caption alignnone" id="attachment_297" style="width: 300px">
<a href="http://aiimpacts.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/human-level-AI.png"><img alt="From Superintelligence Reading Group" class="wp-image-297 size-medium" height="230" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" src="http://aiimpacts.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/human-level-AI-300x230.png" srcset="https://aiimpacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/human-level-AI-300x230.png 300w, https://aiimpacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/human-level-AI.png 668w" width="300"/></a>
<figcaption class="wp-caption-text" id="caption-attachment-297">
                    Example of how the first ‘human-level’ AI may surpass humans in many ways.
                  </figcaption>
</figure>
</blockquote>
</HTML>
AI Impacts Wiki

User Tools

Site Tools

Page Tools
