This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
arguments_for_ai_risk:views_of_ai_developers_on_risk_from_ai [2023/06/02 23:24] rickkorzekwa Added note at top that the page is in an early, unfinished state |
arguments_for_ai_risk:views_of_ai_developers_on_risk_from_ai [2024/03/09 18:18] (current) katjagrace [Geoffrey Hinton, 2018 Turing Award recipient] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 120: | Line 120: | ||
==== Geoffrey Hinton, 2018 Turing Award recipient ==== | ==== Geoffrey Hinton, 2018 Turing Award recipient ==== | ||
- | > I think there are two existential threats that are much bigger than AI. One is global nuclear war, and the other is [synthetic biology]. I think that's what people should | + | >If I were advising governments, |
- | > I hope the rewards | + | //Financial Times [[https:// |
- | // | + | > There' |
+ | |||
+ | //NPR [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | >My big worry is, sooner or later someone will wire into them the ability to create their own subgoals... I think it’ll very quickly realize that getting more control is a very good subgoal because it helps you achieve other goals... And if these things get carried away with getting more control, we’re in trouble. | ||
+ | |||
+ | >And if [AI models] are much smarter than us, they’ll be very good at manipulating us. You won’t realize what’s going on... So even if they can’t directly pull levers, they can certainly get us to pull levers. It turns out if you can manipulate people, you can invade a building in Washington without ever going there yourself. | ||
+ | |||
+ | // | ||
==== Yann LeCun, Meta, Chief AI Scientist, 2018 Turing Award recipient ==== | ==== Yann LeCun, Meta, Chief AI Scientist, 2018 Turing Award recipient ==== |