This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
featured_articles:evidence_against_current_methods_leading_to_human_level_artificial_intelligence [2022/10/19 01:57] katjagrace [Methods] |
featured_articles:evidence_against_current_methods_leading_to_human_level_artificial_intelligence [2022/10/19 02:01] (current) katjagrace |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
// Published 12 August, 2019; last updated 07 October, 2019 // | // Published 12 August, 2019; last updated 07 October, 2019 // | ||
- | < | + | This is a list of published arguments that we know of that current methods in artificial intelligence will not lead to human-level AI. |
- | <p>This is a list of published arguments that we know of that current methods in artificial intelligence will not lead to human-level AI.</ | + | |
- | </ | + | |
Line 15: | Line 12: | ||
- | < | + | We take ‘current methods’ to mean techniques for engineering artificial intelligence that are already known, involving no “qualitatively new ideas”.((“It now seems possible that we could build ‘prosaic’ AGI, which can replicate human behavior but doesn’t involve qualitatively new ideas about ‘how intelligence works’”— Christiano, Paul. [[https:// |
- | <p>We take ‘current methods’ to mean techniques for engineering artificial intelligence that are already known, involving no “qualitatively new ideas”.<span class=" | + | |
- | </ | + | |