User Tools

Site Tools


ai_timelines:predictions_of_human-level_ai_timelines:ai_timeline_surveys:agi-11_survey

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

ai_timelines:predictions_of_human-level_ai_timelines:ai_timeline_surveys:agi-11_survey [2022/09/21 07:37] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +====== AGI-11 survey ======
 +
 +// Published 10 November, 2018; last updated 23 April, 2020 //
 +
 +<HTML>
 +<p>The AGI-11 survey was a survey of 60 participants at the AGI-11 conference. In it:</p>
 +</HTML>
 +
 +
 +<HTML>
 +<ul>
 +<li><div class="li">Nearly half of respondents believed that AGI would appear before 2030.</div></li>
 +<li><div class="li">Nearly 90% of respondents believed that AGI would appear before 2100.</div></li>
 +<li><div class="li">About 85% of respondents believed that AGI would be beneficial for humankind.</div></li>
 +</ul>
 +</HTML>
 +
 +
 +
 +===== Details =====
 +
 +
 +<HTML>
 +<p>James Barrat and Ben Goertzel surveyed participants at the <a href="http://agi-conference.org/2011/">AGI-11</a> conference on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_General_Intelligence">AGI</a> timelines. The survey had two questions, administered over email after the conference. The results were fairly similar to those from the more complex <a href="/doku.php?id=ai_timelines:predictions_of_human-level_ai_timelines:ai_timeline_surveys:agi-09_survey">AGI-09</a> survey, for which Ben Goertzel was also an author.</p>
 +</HTML>
 +
 +
 +<HTML>
 +<p>Sixty people total responded to the survey, out of <a href="http://agi-conf.org/2011/2011/08/13/agi-11-a-smashing-success/">over 200</a> conference registrations. Nobody skipped either of the two questions.</p>
 +</HTML>
 +
 +
 +<HTML>
 +<p>The data in this post, and the results tables, are taken from the <a href="http://hplusmagazine.com/2011/09/16/how-long-till-agi-views-of-agi-11-conference-participants/">write up on this survey</a> in h+ magazine.</p>
 +</HTML>
 +
 +
 +==== Question One ====
 +
 +
 +<HTML>
 +<p>Question one was: “I believe that AGI (however I define it) will be effectively implemented in the following timeframe:”</p>
 +</HTML>
 +
 +
 +<HTML>
 +<p>The answer choices were:</p>
 +</HTML>
 +
 +
 +<HTML>
 +<ul>
 +<li><div class="li">Before 2030</div></li>
 +<li><div class="li">2030-2049</div></li>
 +<li><div class="li">2050-2099</div></li>
 +<li><div class="li">After 2100</div></li>
 +<li><div class="li">Never</div></li>
 +</ul>
 +</HTML>
 +
 +
 +<HTML>
 +<p>The results were:</p>
 +</HTML>
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +==== Question Two ====
 +
 +
 +<HTML>
 +<p>Question two was: “I believe that AGI (however I define it) will be a net positive event for humankind:”</p>
 +</HTML>
 +
 +
 +<HTML>
 +<p>The answer choices were:</p>
 +</HTML>
 +
 +
 +<HTML>
 +<ul>
 +<li><div class="li">True</div></li>
 +<li><div class="li">False</div></li>
 +</ul>
 +</HTML>
 +
 +
 +<HTML>
 +<p>The results were:</p>
 +</HTML>
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +==== Comments ====
 +
 +
 +<HTML>
 +<p>As well as the two survey questions, there was also a form where respondents could submit comments. These are recorded in the <a href="http://hplusmagazine.com/2011/09/16/how-long-till-agi-views-of-agi-11-conference-participants/">h+ magazine</a> write up. Many of the comments expressed concern with the survey structure, suggesting that there could have been more or different options.</p>
 +</HTML>
 +
 +
 +===== Contributions =====
 +
 +
 +<HTML>
 +<p><em>Justis Mills researched for and wrote this post. Katja Grace provided feedback on style and content. Thanks to James Barrat for linking us to the h+ magazine write up when we reached out to him about his survey.</em></p>
 +</HTML>
 +
 +
  
ai_timelines/predictions_of_human-level_ai_timelines/ai_timeline_surveys/agi-11_survey.txt · Last modified: 2022/09/21 07:37 (external edit)